Re: The Nordic + group and “learning from others with aligning commitments”.
Just a note for future sessions. There is a broad alignment between these commitments below that doesn’t appear to be seen just yet. Perhaps because they have not been addressed by all countries at the same time. But more likely because the technicians who run public networks haven’t found their voice. N.B This is a limited list.
Here’s a video which sets the scene/acts as a a discussion paper.
Denmark A citizen’s account that will contain all their info, and comms, from and between every government agency.
Estonia. Developing a (more central) Co creation workspace.
Estonia. Developing the Piloting Framework. The step before a developed co-creation space.
Finland. Supporting Everyone’s possibility to participate. “The different forms of participation function only if citizens can find them”. i.e. the directory for co-creation spaces.
Germany. Open source platform/co-creation space for public (and admin).
Germany. Institutionalising Dialogue Network(s). The concept is intended to enable ministries to institutionalise innovative participation formats as part of the policy consultation process.
Ireland Enhancing civil participation networks and mechanisms.
Latvia. Strengthen the Framework for public participation.
Lithuania. Customer (Citizen?) centric approach to/in/by the Public sector.
Lithuania. Improving Public Consultation Mechanisms.
Nederlands Citizen control of (their) data
Nederlands.Strengthening citizen participation with Digital Tools.
Norway. User Orientation.
Norway. Egovernment with an End user focus.
Sweden. Citizen-centic Egovernment.